Saturday 1 September 2007

New Cancer Weapon


Nuclear Nanocapsules

Rice University chemists have found a way to package some of nature's most powerful radioactive particles inside DNA-sized tubes of pure carbon - a method they hope to use to target tiny tumors and even lone leukemia cells.


"There are no FDA-approved cancer therapies that employ alpha-particle radiation," said lead researcher Lon Wilson, professor of chemistry. "Approved therapies that use beta particles are not well-suited for treating cancer at the single-cell level because it takes thousands of beta particles to kill a lone cell.

By contrast, cancer cells can be destroyed with just one direct hit from an alpha particle on a cell nucleus."

In the study, Wilson, Rice graduate student Keith Hartman, University of Washington (UW) radiation oncologist Scott Wilbur and UW research scientist Donald Hamlin, developed and tested a process to load astatine atoms inside short sections of carbon nanotubes.

Because astatine is the rarest naturally occurring element on Earth - with less than a teaspoon estimated to exist in the Earth's crust at any given time - the research was conducted using astatine created in a UW cyclotron.

Astatine, like radium and uranium, emits alpha particles via radioactive decay. Alpha particles, which contain two protons and two neutrons, are the most massive particles emitted as radiation. About 4,000 times more massive than the electrons emitted by beta decay - the type of radiation most commonly used to treat cancer.

"It's something like the difference between a cannon shell and a BB," Wilson said. "The extra mass increases the amount of damage alpha particles can inflict on cancer cells."

The speed of radioactive particles is also an important factor in medical use. Beta particles travel very fast. This, combined with their small size, gives them significant penetrating power.

In cancer treatment, for example, beams of beta particles can be created outside the patient's body and directed at tumors. Alpha particles move much more slowly, and because they are also massive, they have very little penetrating power. They can be stopped by something as flimsy as tissue paper.

"The unique combination of low penetrating power and large particle mass make alpha particle ideal for targeting cancer at the single-cell level," Wilson said. "The difficulty in developing ways to use them to treat cancer has come in finding ways to deliver them quickly and directly to the cancer site."

In prior work, Wilson and colleagues developed techniques to attach antibodies to carbon fullerenes like nanotubes. Antibodies are proteins produced by white blood cells. Each antibody is designed to recognize and bind only with a specific antigen, and doctors have identified a host of cancer-specific antibodies that can be used to kill cancer cells.

In follow-up research, Wilson hopes to test the single-celled cancer targeting approach by attaching cancer-specific antibodies to astatine-loaded nanotubes.

One complicating factor in any astatine-based cancer therapy will be the element's short, 7.5-hour half-life. In radioactive decay, the term half-life refers to the time required for any quantity of a substance to decay by half its initial mass.

Due to astatine's brief half-life, any treatment must be delivered in a timely way, before the particles lose their potency.
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

12 comments:

Winnie said...

So are there only 3 elements that emit alpha particles?
Facinating research....
They need a 'basooka' to get it fired off..hmm..will be interesting to see/hear what happens

QUASAR9 said...

The alpha emitter polonium-210 is suspected of playing a role in lung and bladder cancer related to tobacco smoking.

Most smoke detectors contain a small amount of the alpha emitter americium-241. This isotope is extremely dangerous if inhaled or ingested, but the danger is minimal if the source is kept sealed.

Because of their charge and large mass, alpha particles are easily absorbed by materials and can travel only a few centimeters in air. They can be absorbed by tissue paper or the outer layers of human skin (about 40 micrometres, equivalent to a few cells deep) and so are not generally dangerous to life unless the source is ingested or inhaled. Because of this high mass and strong absorption, however, if alpha radiation does enter the body (most often because radioactive material has been inhaled or ingested), it is the most destructive form of ionizing radiation.

It is estimated that chromosome damage from alpha particles is about 100 times greater than that caused by an equivalent amount of other radiation.

mal said...

current chemo is a race to see if they can poison the cancer before they poison the patient. From my view, thats a really nasty tight rope.

I understand the problem of dealing with a short half life product but the benefits would be phenomenal. Thats why the have nuts and bolts engineers like me to work those problems.

The implications for Nano-tech in general are mind boggling. The impact may cross every industry line in the coming years. I suspect that as it shakes out, it will become the economic engine that picks up where info tech is "maturing".

Exciting stuff

QUASAR9 said...

Hi Mal, nano technology in medicine like pharmacology seems to be a boom industry like you say

However it does seem most of the promises it offers are still as distant as the miracle drugs and 'silver bullets' the pharmaceutical industry promised.

I guess it is 'natural' evolution that they start to work alongside each other. It would be nice if we could prescribe a nanobot that goes around clearing up arteries, or terminating rebellious cells, but when we think of the myriad of drugs that exist - the mind boggles at the myriad of nanobots that would need to be created to treat every illness and malady known.

I do wonder as with all research, how much is led by where research sees a 'market' or funding, and how much is led by what is needed and what can be done. After all stem cells promised much several decades ago and have yet to deliver. I guess despite the leaps & bound in science, some things just move or crawl at snail's pace

Shimmerrings said...

It's amazing what we know and how little we can utilize what we know... because we need to know just a little bit more. And the mind turns. As you suggest, Quasar, there are all the kinks in between... and a whole lotta those are controled by the powers that be.

QUASAR9 said...

Indeed Shimmerrings
Medical Science always reminds me of the "hare and the tortoise"

the hare jumping up and down laughing at how slow the tortoise is, boasting about how high it can jump and how fast it can run...

whilst the tortoise plods on living to a ripe old age, thinking to himself - "the only reason there is no rabbit stew on the menu tonite, is because humans having been able to engineer more meat onto hares in the factory farm or lab, otherwise they'd be served up on a platter like chickem, beef, pork or lamb."

Most Medical Science & Research seems more concerned with its own survival and well being than the patient's fate. Otherwise by now we would have cured every illness and malady known to man. But where is the profit in that.

Shimmerrings said...

Indeed... where is the profit in that...

mal said...

Q9- Nano tech has possible applications beyond medicine. The potential is in areas that include transportation, manufacturing, coatings, waste abatement, electronics et al. I think we can add almost anything to that list. It really is mind boggling

Katie McKenna said...

My adopted mum has throat cancer..she goes in for her biopsy Friday. Two years ago in was breast cancer... a non-smoker.. she has a spot of cancer in her lung as well...

I don't believe the governments actually want to "discover" cures for everything. After all, there's no money in that.

Now they are trying to control "natural" herbs, remedies, vitamins.. piece by piece... even as they lie to the people. Then there are cases of the gov against the people when the people refuse certain treatment...

crazy world...

QUASAR9 said...

Hi Mal,
the potential applications for nanotechnology are mind boggling.
I meant that in medicine just as with drugs, we will require an almost infinite number of different nanonots for each of a multitude of conditions taylored to patient needs. As with most things, not one nanobot or treatment fits (benefits) everyone.

QUASAR9 said...

Hi Katie,
I wish your close ones well, but I can see in the US you live in the society of choice, the choice of medicine you are given or on offer

And in some cases Take it or leave it is not a choice? now that's what they call a free democracy

QUASAR9 said...

Hi Alban, I've yet to hear of god or prayer making toothdecay and toothache go away. However I'm not much impressed with the dentistry available at your average dentist.

What is true is that sometimes people will submit to any promise from Medical Science. People want a cure, and they want it now.
Seems it is easier to have Blind Faith in the tangible no matter how bizarre, even if it may not work, rather put one's faith in the intangible with little evidence or even less proof.

PS - Interesting site, I'll be back