Wednesday 8 October 2008

Brain Images

People are more likely to believe findings from a neuroscience study when the report is paired with a coloured image of a brain as opposed to other representational images of data such as bar graphs, according to a new Colorado State University study.

Image - Aaron Kondziela

Persuasive influence on public perception

Scientists and journalists have recently suggested that brain images have a persuasive influence on the public perception of research on cognition. This idea was tested directly in a series of experiments reported by David McCabe, an assistant professor in the Department of Psychology at Colorado State, and his colleague Alan Castel, an assistant professor at University of California, Los Angeles. The forthcoming paper, to be published in the journal Cognition, was recently published online.

"We found the use of brain images to represent the level of brain activity associated with cognitive processes clearly influenced ratings of scientific merit," McCabe said. "This sort of visual evidence of physical systems at work is typical in areas of science like chemistry and physics, but has not traditionally been associated with research on cognition.

"We think this is the reason people find brain images compelling. The images provide a physical basis for thinking."

In a series of three experiments, undergraduate students were either asked to read brief articles that made fictitious and unsubstantiated claims such as "watching television increases math skills," or they read a real article describing research showing that brain imaging can be used as a lie detector.

When the research participants were asked to rate their agreement with the conclusions reached in the article, ratings were higher when a brain image had accompanied the article, compared to when it did not use a brain image or included a bar graph representing the data.

This effect occurred regardless of whether the article described a fictitious, implausible finding or realistic research.

"Cognitive neuroscience studies which appear in mainstream media are often oversimplified and conclusions can be misrepresented," McCabe said. "We hope that our findings get people thinking more before making sensational claims based on brain imaging data, such as when they claim there is a 'God spot' in the brain."
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Like Goldilocks, the brain seeks proportions that are "just right."
Brain needs perfection in synapse number from Baylor College of Medicine
What Emotional Memories are made of from John Hopkins Medicine
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

11 comments:

stardad9591 said...

I tried to comment on this at your other site, but the haloscan is down.

As an epilepsy patient under the care of a neurologist, I find this rather compelling. But when causes of certain brain functions, or afflictions do not have a notable physical explanation (such as an MRI or CAT scan is able to find), no answer can be given, as in the case of my own epileptic seizures.

I do realize in most cases, actual brain mapping can give physical causes to most cognitive fuctions.

But as my neurologist told me, "even with all of our technology, neuroscience is not an exact "science".

Straight from the horse's mouth.

QUASAR9 said...

Hi Bryan, this article deals more with perception or how we are more persuaded by images (of the brain) than by graphs or data.
Of course as with anything in the brain one thing is to pinpoint with MRI or CAT scans, where activity takes place or appears to take place in the brain (during epilletic seizures, or after a stroke, or in the onset of alzheimers) and another thing is establishing the actual cause, or how to treat or even prevent the condition.

But despite all medical advances, we are still 'powerless' when it comes to successfully diagnosing or treating certain conditions, and unable to fathom how to treat and cure others.

It would be nice to discern one decisive treatment for epilepsy. In the meantime here's Wishing you all the best.

Unknown said...

Hey - how you been. Fascinating article - I think it makes an unfathomable mystery seem within the reach of our limited cognitive resources and so we find images coloured or otherwise a palpable reality. More alive than graphs etc

QUASAR9 said...

Hi Random,
seems most of us are persuaded much more easily by images, especially when it comes to brain images. But as they say don't believe everything you see (or read).

Gill said...

I am so brain phobic its borderline wacko.
I watched Hannibal. I couldn't stomach anything to do with the human brain after that, I think seeing that snapped something in my own brain.
It terrifies me.
So, I avoid any image now.
This one wasn't so bad however.


Just popped in to say hello, and I am catching up on my friends. Hope you are well.
xo
Blue

Gill said...

I am so brain phobic its borderline wacko.
I watched Hannibal. I couldn't stomach anything to do with the human brain after that, I think seeing that snapped something in my own brain.
It terrifies me.
So, I avoid any image now.
This one wasn't so bad however.


Just popped in to say hello, and I am catching up on my friends. Hope you are well.
xo
Blue

serenity said...

Hi Q!

Hope all is well in your universe :)

I'm not clear on whether the brain image is a "real" image, with perhaps colors or shading for emphasis, or a colored graphical representation merely shaped into the form of a brain? If it is a "real" image of the brain with coloring for emphasis, perhaps it lends itself to more credibility because a person believes they are viewing something occurring that is "real", or evidence based, even though really the average person is relying solely on the interpretation given to them by someone who can read and interpret a brain scan.

serenity said...

oh and I forgot to leave a hug :)

Mary said...

I find it works for me. More like looking at art!

ANNA-LYS said...

I do think that we have trough generations by media developed a perception that seeks more pictures than "getting the picture" ... and I must admit it scares my because it might have an impact on our imaginative skills.

Before when we read or looked at a graph "the picture" evolved in our head ... we did not need an outside tool to think by .... or be affected by ...

Yeah ... I am sure You know where I am heading ...

Have a nice weekend ;-)

Winnie said...

ok in the credits " Like Goldilocks ...."
We all seek proportions that are just right to us...in regards to the opposite sex....burgers...beer glasses..and even dogs!
Don't men always remember the Blonde with big boobs???
Women remember BIG moments?
Something for all of us to remember in our golden years..LOL!!